Paraguay vs Rwanda: Agriculture: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Paraguay
107,725 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
120,357 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Paraguay rank
6th
Rwanda rank
5th

Agriculture: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Paraguay
  • Rwanda
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 120,357 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 107,725 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Paraguay, a difference of 12,632 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Paraguay ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 142 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Paraguay Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 14,045 1000 SLC per square kilometre 39,319 1000 SLC per square kilometre 25,275 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 19,371 1000 SLC per square kilometre 56,840 1000 SLC per square kilometre 37,469 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 29,736 1000 SLC per square kilometre 75,506 1000 SLC per square kilometre 45,770 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 41,907 1000 SLC per square kilometre 73,698 1000 SLC per square kilometre 31,791 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 58,851 1000 SLC per square kilometre 99,350 1000 SLC per square kilometre 40,498 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 96,848 1000 SLC per square kilometre 115,892 1000 SLC per square kilometre 19,044 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 106,111 1000 SLC per square kilometre 118,518 1000 SLC per square kilometre 12,406 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Paraguay or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 120,357 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 107,725 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Paraguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Paraguay and Rwanda?
12,632 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Paraguay and Rwanda rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Paraguay ranks 6th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Paraguay vs Rwanda: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/paraguay/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/paraguay/rwanda/">Paraguay vs Rwanda: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.