Malawi vs Rwanda: Agriculture: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Malawi
69,051 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
120,357 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
8th
Rwanda rank
5th

Agriculture: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Malawi
  • Rwanda
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 120,357 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 69,051 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 51,306 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.7 times Malawi's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 8th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 142 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 4,387 1000 SLC per square kilometre 39,319 1000 SLC per square kilometre 34,933 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 6,842 1000 SLC per square kilometre 56,840 1000 SLC per square kilometre 49,998 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 8,097 1000 SLC per square kilometre 75,506 1000 SLC per square kilometre 67,409 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 12,759 1000 SLC per square kilometre 74,028 1000 SLC per square kilometre 61,270 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 24,018 1000 SLC per square kilometre 99,350 1000 SLC per square kilometre 75,332 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 47,797 1000 SLC per square kilometre 115,892 1000 SLC per square kilometre 68,095 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 66,989 1000 SLC per square kilometre 118,518 1000 SLC per square kilometre 51,529 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Malawi or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 120,357 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 69,051 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Malawi and Rwanda?
51,306 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Rwanda?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Rwanda rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Malawi ranks 8th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Rwanda: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/malawi/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/malawi/rwanda/">Malawi vs Rwanda: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.