Kuwait vs Namibia: Agriculture: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Kuwait
4.28 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
5.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Kuwait rank
140th
Namibia rank
138th

Agriculture: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Kuwait
  • Namibia
0246196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 5.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 4.28 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Kuwait, a difference of 1.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Kuwait's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Kuwait ranks 140th and Namibia ranks 138th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1246 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.2 1000 SLC per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.3113 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.86 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.98 1000 SLC per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.9844 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.29 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.31 1000 SLC per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 2.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.93 1000 SLC per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 4.89 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4.75 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1419 1000 SLC per square kilometre Kuwait
2020s 4.33 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7713 1000 SLC per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Kuwait or Namibia?
Namibia, at 5.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 4.28 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Kuwait as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Kuwait and Namibia?
1.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kuwait and Namibia rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Kuwait ranks 140th and Namibia ranks 138th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kuwait vs Namibia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/kuwait/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/kuwait/namibia/">Kuwait vs Namibia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.