Iraq vs Pakistan: Agriculture: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Iraq
10,983 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
10,454 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Iraq rank
25th
Pakistan rank
26th

Agriculture: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Iraq
  • Pakistan
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 10,983 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 10,454 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 529 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.

Iraq ranks 25th and Pakistan ranks 26th of 142 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 5,713 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,260 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,453 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iraq
1970s 7,316 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,826 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,490 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iraq
1980s 10,118 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,676 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7,443 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iraq
1990s 11,661 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,169 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7,492 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iraq
2000s 12,853 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,619 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7,234 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iraq
2010s 12,606 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7,857 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,749 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iraq
2020s 13,661 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9,713 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,948 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Iraq or Pakistan?
Iraq, at 10,983 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 10,454 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Iraq and Pakistan?
529 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iraq and Pakistan rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Iraq ranks 25th and Pakistan ranks 26th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Pakistan: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/iraq/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/iraq/pakistan/">Iraq vs Pakistan: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.