Guinea vs Rwanda: Agriculture: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Guinea
86,111 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
120,357 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea rank
7th
Rwanda rank
5th

Agriculture: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Guinea
  • Rwanda
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 120,357 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 86,111 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Guinea, a difference of 34,246 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.4 times Guinea's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 7th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 142 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 13,223 1000 SLC per square kilometre 39,319 1000 SLC per square kilometre 26,096 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 14,952 1000 SLC per square kilometre 56,840 1000 SLC per square kilometre 41,888 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 17,307 1000 SLC per square kilometre 75,506 1000 SLC per square kilometre 58,199 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 25,472 1000 SLC per square kilometre 73,698 1000 SLC per square kilometre 48,226 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 36,648 1000 SLC per square kilometre 99,350 1000 SLC per square kilometre 62,701 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 57,554 1000 SLC per square kilometre 115,892 1000 SLC per square kilometre 58,338 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 78,004 1000 SLC per square kilometre 118,518 1000 SLC per square kilometre 40,513 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Guinea or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 120,357 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 86,111 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Guinea and Rwanda?
34,246 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea and Rwanda rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Guinea ranks 7th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Rwanda: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/guinea/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/guinea/rwanda/">Guinea vs Rwanda: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.