Ecuador vs Peru: Agriculture: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Ecuador
35.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
43.48 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
121st
Peru rank
119th

Agriculture: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Ecuador
  • Peru
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 43.48 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 35.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 7.79 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 121st and Peru ranks 119th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Peru in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 9.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8.39 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7228 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 10.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2413 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 11.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11.44 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1608 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 18.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre 14.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 24.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre 23.82 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7308 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 31.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre 35.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4.09 1000 SLC per square kilometre Peru
2020s 33.82 1000 SLC per square kilometre 42.82 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9 1000 SLC per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Ecuador or Peru?
Peru, at 43.48 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 35.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Ecuador and Peru?
7.79 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Ecuador ranks 121st and Peru ranks 119th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Peru: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/peru/">Ecuador vs Peru: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.