Chile vs Pakistan: Agriculture: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Chile
13,331 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
10,454 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
23rd
Pakistan rank
26th

Agriculture: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Chile
  • Pakistan
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 13,331 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 10,454 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 2,877 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Pakistan's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 23rd and Pakistan ranks 26th of 142 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 3,869 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,260 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,608 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
1970s 4,386 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,826 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,560 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
1980s 5,500 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,676 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,824 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
1990s 8,194 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,169 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,025 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
2000s 10,894 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,619 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,275 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
2010s 12,672 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7,857 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,814 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
2020s 13,313 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9,713 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,600 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Chile or Pakistan?
Chile, at 13,331 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 10,454 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Chile and Pakistan?
2,877 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Pakistan rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Chile ranks 23rd and Pakistan ranks 26th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Pakistan: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/chile/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/chile/pakistan/">Chile vs Pakistan: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.