Antigua and Barbuda vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … capita SLC

Antigua and Barbuda
0.4783 1000 SLC per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.4628 1000 SLC per person
in 2024
Antigua and Barbuda rank
125th
Zimbabwe rank
127th

Agriculture: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … capita SLC over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Zimbabwe
0.20.40.60.811.2196119922024

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.4783 1000 SLC per person against 0.4628 1000 SLC per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0155 1000 SLC per person.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 127th of 142 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.397 1000 SLC per person 0.3926 1000 SLC per person 0.0045 1000 SLC per person Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 0.5532 1000 SLC per person 0.4568 1000 SLC per person 0.0964 1000 SLC per person Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0.9951 1000 SLC per person 0.4388 1000 SLC per person 0.5563 1000 SLC per person Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 0.9671 1000 SLC per person 0.3373 1000 SLC per person 0.6298 1000 SLC per person Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0.8661 1000 SLC per person 0.3307 1000 SLC per person 0.5355 1000 SLC per person Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.5192 1000 SLC per person 0.3573 1000 SLC per person 0.1619 1000 SLC per person Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 0.4956 1000 SLC per person 0.4478 1000 SLC per person 0.0478 1000 SLC per person Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Antigua and Barbuda or Zimbabwe?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.4783 1000 SLC per person against 0.4628 1000 SLC per person in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Antigua and Barbuda and Zimbabwe?
0.0155 1000 SLC per person, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Zimbabwe?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 127th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/zimbabwe/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per capita
Unit
1000 SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,171 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.