Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Rwanda
133.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
128.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
13th
Sri Lanka rank
15th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sri Lanka
255075100125150196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 133.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 128.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 4.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 13th and Sri Lanka ranks 15th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 5 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 34.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 32.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 50.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 40.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 70.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 49.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 21.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 70.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 74.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 101.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 91.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 126.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 122.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 131.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 132.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
Rwanda, at 133.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 128.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
4.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Rwanda ranks 13th and Sri Lanka ranks 15th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sri-lanka/">Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.