Italy vs Pakistan: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Italy
123.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
111.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Italy rank
16th
Pakistan rank
19th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Italy
  • Pakistan
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Italy currently reports 123.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 111.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 12.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Italy ranks 16th and Pakistan ranks 19th of 172 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 15.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 108.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
1970s 134.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 20.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 114.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
1980s 149.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 30.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 119.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
1990s 150.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 46.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 103.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
2000s 149.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 62.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 87.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
2010s 135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 86.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 48.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
2020s 129.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 103.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 25.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Italy or Pakistan?
Italy, at 123.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 111.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Italy and Pakistan?
12.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Italy and Pakistan rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Italy ranks 16th and Pakistan ranks 19th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs Pakistan: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/italy/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/italy/pakistan/">Italy vs Pakistan: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.