Iceland vs Suriname: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Iceland
1.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.9545 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
167th
Suriname rank
170th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Iceland
  • Suriname
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 1.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9545 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.8155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.9 times Suriname's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 167th and Suriname ranks 170th of 172 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5057 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 1.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.752 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7479 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 1.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3898 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 1.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2446 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 1.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8991 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5462 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 1.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 1.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.776 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Iceland or Suriname?
Iceland, at 1.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9545 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Iceland and Suriname?
0.8155 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Suriname rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Iceland ranks 167th and Suriname ranks 170th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Suriname: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iceland/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iceland/suriname/">Iceland vs Suriname: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.