Iceland vs Libya: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Iceland
1.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya
1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
167th
Libya rank
168th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Iceland
  • Libya
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 1.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 0.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.7 times Libya's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 167th and Libya ranks 168th of 172 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Libya Difference Ahead
1960s 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2099 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 1.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3969 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 1.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.623 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.878 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 1.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4444 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 1.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9367 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5086 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 1.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6858 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 1.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7195 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Iceland or Libya?
Iceland, at 1.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Iceland and Libya?
0.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Libya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Libya rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Iceland ranks 167th and Libya ranks 168th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Libya: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iceland/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iceland/libya/">Iceland vs Libya: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.