Guatemala vs Portugal: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Guatemala
85.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
83.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
32nd
Portugal rank
34th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Portugal
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 85.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 83.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Portugal, a difference of 2.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.

Guatemala ranks 32nd and Portugal ranks 34th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Portugal in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 12.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 53.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 41.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 18.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 53.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 34.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 22.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 54.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 32.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 31.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 64.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 32.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 48.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 64.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 15.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 73.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 67.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 84.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 79.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Guatemala or Portugal?
Guatemala, at 85.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 83.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Guatemala and Portugal?
2.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Portugal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Portugal rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Guatemala ranks 32nd and Portugal ranks 34th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Portugal: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/portugal/">Guatemala vs Portugal: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.