Guatemala vs Jamaica: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Guatemala
85.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
81.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
32nd
Jamaica rank
35th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Jamaica
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 85.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 81.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 3.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

Guatemala ranks 32nd and Jamaica ranks 35th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Jamaica in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 12.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 53.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 41.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 18.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 53.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 35.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 22.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 53.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 31.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 31.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 70.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 38.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 48.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 71.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 23.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 73.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 72.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6563 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 84.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 78.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Guatemala or Jamaica?
Guatemala, at 85.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 81.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Guatemala and Jamaica?
3.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Jamaica rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Guatemala ranks 32nd and Jamaica ranks 35th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Jamaica: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/jamaica/">Guatemala vs Jamaica: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.