Ecuador vs Myanmar: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Ecuador
38.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar
38.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
78th
Myanmar rank
77th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Myanmar
1020304050196119922023

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 38.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 38.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 78th and Myanmar ranks 77th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Myanmar in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 10.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 11.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 13.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 14.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9169 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Myanmar
1990s 20.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 28.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 33.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Myanmar
2010s 34.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 44.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Myanmar
2020s 36.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 38.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Ecuador or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 38.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 38.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Ecuador and Myanmar?
0.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Myanmar rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Ecuador ranks 78th and Myanmar ranks 77th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Myanmar: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/myanmar/">Ecuador vs Myanmar: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.