Cuba vs South Africa: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Cuba
19.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
19.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
110th
South Africa rank
108th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Cuba
  • South Africa
0204060196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 19.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 19.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 110th and South Africa ranks 108th of 172 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 35.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 28.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 45.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 36.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 56.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 45.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 43.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 32.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 45.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 31.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 43.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 25.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 28.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 19.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Cuba or South Africa?
South Africa, at 19.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 19.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Cuba and South Africa?
0.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and South Africa rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Cuba ranks 110th and South Africa ranks 108th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs South Africa: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cuba/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/cuba/south-africa/">Cuba vs South Africa: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.