Congo vs Mongolia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Congo
1.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia
1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
165th
Mongolia rank
166th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Congo
  • Mongolia
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 1.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mongolia, a difference of 0.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mongolia ahead.

Congo ranks 165th and Mongolia ranks 166th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Mongolia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mongolia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5936 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5869 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.6604 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7584 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.098 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mongolia
1980s 0.8062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mongolia
1990s 0.9628 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0567 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8148 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4986 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 1.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6967 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 1.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1602 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Congo or Mongolia?
Congo, at 1.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mongolia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Congo and Mongolia?
0.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mongolia?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Mongolia rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Congo ranks 165th and Mongolia ranks 166th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mongolia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mongolia/">Congo vs Mongolia: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.