China vs Pakistan: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

China
107.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
111.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
21st
Pakistan rank
19th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • China
  • Pakistan
0255075100196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 111.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 107.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 3.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

China ranks 21st and Pakistan ranks 19th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 4 and Pakistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 13.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 15.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 18.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 20.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 28.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 30.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 46.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 46.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7707 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2000s 70.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 62.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2010s 93.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 86.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2020s 104.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 103.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1285 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), China or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 111.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 107.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between China and Pakistan?
3.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Pakistan rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
China ranks 21st and Pakistan ranks 19th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Pakistan: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/china/pakistan/">China vs Pakistan: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.