Brazil vs Maldives: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Brazil
32.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives
31.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
85th
Maldives rank
86th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Brazil
  • Maldives
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 32.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 31.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Maldives, a difference of 0.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Maldives ahead.

Brazil ranks 85th and Maldives ranks 86th of 172 countries.

Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Maldives Difference Ahead
1960s 4.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 32.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 28.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
1970s 6.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 43.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 36.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
1980s 9.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 55.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 45.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
1990s 11.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 36.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 25.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 17.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 43.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 25.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
2010s 24.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 32.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
2020s 29.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 31.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Brazil or Maldives?
Brazil, at 32.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 31.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Maldives as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Brazil and Maldives?
0.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Maldives?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Maldives rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Brazil ranks 85th and Maldives ranks 86th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Maldives: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/brazil/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/brazil/maldives/">Brazil vs Maldives: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.