Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Eswatini: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
28.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
27.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
93rd
Eswatini rank
95th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Eswatini
1015202530196119922023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 28.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 27.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 1.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Eswatini ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Eswatini ranks 95th of 172 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 19.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 21.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 23.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 22.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 27.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 26.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 29.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 26.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Eswatini?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 28.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 27.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eswatini?
1.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eswatini?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eswatini rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 93rd and Eswatini ranks 95th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Eswatini: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/eswatini/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Eswatini: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.