Barbados vs Rwanda: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Barbados
131.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
133.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
14th
Rwanda rank
13th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Barbados
  • Rwanda
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 133.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 131.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 2.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 14th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 205.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 34.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 171.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 177.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 50.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 126.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 177.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 70.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 106.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 157.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 70.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 87.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 149.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 101.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 47.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 134.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 126.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 123.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 131.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Barbados or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 133.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 131.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Barbados and Rwanda?
2.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Rwanda rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Barbados ranks 14th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Rwanda: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/barbados/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/barbados/rwanda/">Barbados vs Rwanda: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.