Australia vs Mali: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Australia
6.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali
6.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
143rd
Mali rank
140th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Australia
  • Mali
0246196119922023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 6.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 6.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 143rd and Mali ranks 140th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 6 and Mali in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Mali Difference Ahead
1960s 2.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8975 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1970s 3.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1980s 3.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1990s 4.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 4.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 5.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.348 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2020s 6.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2664 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Australia or Mali?
Mali, at 6.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 6.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Australia and Mali?
0.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mali?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Mali rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Australia ranks 143rd and Mali ranks 140th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Mali: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/australia/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/australia/mali/">Australia vs Mali: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.