Eswatini vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Eswatini
0.4015 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
0.3783 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Eswatini rank
72nd
Papua New Guinea rank
74th

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Papua New Guinea
00.20.40.6196119922024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.4015 1000 Int$ per person against 0.3783 1000 Int$ per person in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0232 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Eswatini ranks 72nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 74th of 172 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4106 1000 Int$ per person 0.5322 1000 Int$ per person 0.1216 1000 Int$ per person Papua New Guinea
1970s 0.5048 1000 Int$ per person 0.5633 1000 Int$ per person 0.0585 1000 Int$ per person Papua New Guinea
1980s 0.5132 1000 Int$ per person 0.5691 1000 Int$ per person 0.0559 1000 Int$ per person Papua New Guinea
1990s 0.3799 1000 Int$ per person 0.5298 1000 Int$ per person 0.1499 1000 Int$ per person Papua New Guinea
2000s 0.3584 1000 Int$ per person 0.4731 1000 Int$ per person 0.1147 1000 Int$ per person Papua New Guinea
2010s 0.3957 1000 Int$ per person 0.4308 1000 Int$ per person 0.0351 1000 Int$ per person Papua New Guinea
2020s 0.3858 1000 Int$ per person 0.3863 1000 Int$ per person 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Eswatini or Papua New Guinea?
Eswatini, at 0.4015 1000 Int$ per person against 0.3783 1000 Int$ per person in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Eswatini and Papua New Guinea?
0.0232 1000 Int$ per person, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Papua New Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Papua New Guinea rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Eswatini ranks 72nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 74th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/eswatini/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/eswatini/papua-new-guinea/">Eswatini vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 10,001 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.