Equatorial Guinea vs Singapore: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)

Equatorial Guinea
0.0443 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Singapore
0.0112 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
170th
Singapore rank
172nd

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Singapore
00.10.20.3196119922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0443 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0112 1000 Int$ per person in Singapore, a difference of 0.0331 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 3.9 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 170th and Singapore ranks 172nd of 172 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2832 1000 Int$ per person 0.081 1000 Int$ per person 0.2022 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.1706 1000 Int$ per person 0.1345 1000 Int$ per person 0.0361 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.1304 1000 Int$ per person 0.1087 1000 Int$ per person 0.0217 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.1065 1000 Int$ per person 0.0266 1000 Int$ per person 0.0798 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0744 1000 Int$ per person 0.0081 1000 Int$ per person 0.0663 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0565 1000 Int$ per person 0.0087 1000 Int$ per person 0.0478 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0466 1000 Int$ per person 0.0108 1000 Int$ per person 0.0358 1000 Int$ per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand), Equatorial Guinea or Singapore?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0443 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0112 1000 Int$ per person in Singapore as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) between Equatorial Guinea and Singapore?
0.0331 1000 Int$ per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Singapore?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Singapore rank globally for agriculture — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 170th and Singapore ranks 172nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Singapore: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/singapore/">Equatorial Guinea vs Singapore: Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 10,001 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.