Early-demographic dividend vs Uganda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (% of GDP)

Early-demographic dividend
10.7%
in 2025
Uganda
26.1%
in 2025
Early-demographic dividend rank
19th
Uganda rank
20th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (% of GDP) over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Uganda
020406080196019922025

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 26.1% against 10.7% in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 15.4%.

That makes Uganda's figure about 2.4 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 19th and Uganda ranks 20th of 47 groups.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 29.3% 46.5% 17.3% Uganda
1970s 21.8% 63.3% 41.5% Uganda
1980s 16.1% 54.8% 38.7% Uganda
1990s 13.1% 44.3% 31.2% Uganda
2000s 10.0% 25.3% 15.2% Uganda
2010s 10.4% 25.6% 15.2% Uganda
2020s 11.2% 24.4% 13.2% Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Early-demographic dividend or Uganda?
Uganda, at 26.1% against 10.7% in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Early-demographic dividend and Uganda?
15.4%, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Uganda?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Uganda rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 19th and Uganda ranks 20th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Uganda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-percent-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-percent-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/uganda/">Early-demographic dividend vs Uganda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (% of GDP)
Unit
% of GDP
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
254 places, 11,390 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. Note: For VAB countries, gross value added at factor cost is used as the denominator.