Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (% of GDP)

Colombia
9.9%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
9.5%
in 2025
Colombia rank
75th
Zimbabwe rank
78th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (% of GDP) over time

  • Colombia
  • Zimbabwe
510152025196519952025

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 9.9% against 9.5% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.4%.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 75th and Zimbabwe ranks 78th of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 26.7% 19.6% 7.1% Colombia
1970s 23.8% 17.1% 6.7% Colombia
1980s 17.9% 14.8% 3.1% Colombia
1990s 14.7% 15.0% 0.3% Zimbabwe
2000s 7.6% 16.4% 8.8% Zimbabwe
2010s 6.0% 9.6% 3.5% Zimbabwe
2020s 8.7% 14.8% 6.1% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Colombia or Zimbabwe?
Colombia, at 9.9% against 9.5% in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Colombia and Zimbabwe?
0.4%, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Colombia and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Colombia ranks 75th and Zimbabwe ranks 78th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-percent-of-gdp/colombia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-percent-of-gdp/colombia/zimbabwe/">Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (% of GDP)
Unit
% of GDP
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
254 places, 11,390 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. Note: For VAB countries, gross value added at factor cost is used as the denominator.