South Sudan vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)

South Sudan
1.24 billion current US$
in 2015
Zambia
1.19 billion current US$
in 2025
South Sudan rank
131st
Zambia rank
132nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) over time

  • South Sudan
  • Zambia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B196019922025

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 1.24 billion current US$ against 1.19 billion current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 56.65 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Zambia ahead.

South Sudan ranks 131st and Zambia ranks 132nd of 206 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 625.22 million current US$ 1.91 billion current US$ 1.29 billion current US$ Zambia
2010s 1.05 billion current US$ 1.96 billion current US$ 911.54 million current US$ Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, South Sudan or Zambia?
South Sudan, at 1.24 billion current US$ against 1.19 billion current US$ in Zambia as of 2015.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between South Sudan and Zambia?
56.65 million current US$, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zambia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
How do South Sudan and Zambia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
South Sudan ranks 131st and Zambia ranks 132nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 16 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/south-sudan/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/south-sudan/zambia/">South Sudan vs Zambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
254 places, 11,371 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.