Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)

Papua New Guinea
5.24 billion current US$
in 2024
Zimbabwe
4.85 billion current US$
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
90th
Zimbabwe rank
92nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B196119932025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 5.24 billion current US$ against 4.85 billion current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 392.26 million current US$.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 90th and Zimbabwe ranks 92nd of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 185.74 million current US$ 282.91 million current US$ 97.17 million current US$ Zimbabwe
1970s 444.47 million current US$ 619.22 million current US$ 174.75 million current US$ Zimbabwe
1980s 890.89 million current US$ 1.06 billion current US$ 164.79 million current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s 1.35 billion current US$ 1.13 billion current US$ 221.60 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 1.62 billion current US$ 983.56 million current US$ 639.81 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 3.84 billion current US$ 2.39 billion current US$ 1.45 billion current US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 5.05 billion current US$ 6.04 billion current US$ 994.10 million current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Papua New Guinea, at 5.24 billion current US$ against 4.85 billion current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
392.26 million current US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Papua New Guinea ranks 90th and Zimbabwe ranks 92nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 15 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
254 places, 11,371 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.