North Macedonia vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

North Macedonia
1.14 billion current US$
in 2025
South Sudan
1.24 billion current US$
in 2015
North Macedonia rank
134th
South Sudan rank
131st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • North Macedonia
  • South Sudan
500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B199020072025

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 1.24 billion current US$ against 1.14 billion current US$ in North Macedonia, a difference of 100.72 million current US$.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 134th and South Sudan ranks 131st of 206 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia South Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 1.05 billion current US$ 625.22 million current US$ 429.27 million current US$ North Macedonia
2010s 1.01 billion current US$ 1.05 billion current US$ 40.81 million current US$ South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, North Macedonia or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 1.24 billion current US$ against 1.14 billion current US$ in North Macedonia as of 2015.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between North Macedonia and South Sudan?
100.72 million current US$, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and South Sudan?
8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
How do North Macedonia and South Sudan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
North Macedonia ranks 134th and South Sudan ranks 131st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/north-macedonia/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/north-macedonia/south-sudan/">North Macedonia vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
254 places, 11,371 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.