Niger vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)

Niger
10.30 billion current US$
in 2025
South Africa
12.08 billion current US$
in 2025
Niger rank
52nd
South Africa rank
49th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) over time

  • Niger
  • South Africa
02.5B5.0B7.5B10.0B12.5B196019922025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 12.08 billion current US$ against 10.30 billion current US$ in Niger, a difference of 1.78 billion current US$.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Niger's.

Across all 66 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Niger ranks 52nd and South Africa ranks 49th of 206 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 421.79 million current US$ 1.03 billion current US$ 610.15 million current US$ South Africa
1970s 622.33 million current US$ 2.28 billion current US$ 1.66 billion current US$ South Africa
1980s 776.29 million current US$ 4.07 billion current US$ 3.29 billion current US$ South Africa
1990s 884.11 million current US$ 5.07 billion current US$ 4.18 billion current US$ South Africa
2000s 1.69 billion current US$ 5.91 billion current US$ 4.23 billion current US$ South Africa
2010s 3.65 billion current US$ 8.44 billion current US$ 4.79 billion current US$ South Africa
2020s 7.44 billion current US$ 10.45 billion current US$ 3.00 billion current US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Niger or South Africa?
South Africa, at 12.08 billion current US$ against 10.30 billion current US$ in Niger as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Niger and South Africa?
1.78 billion current US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and South Africa?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Niger and South Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Niger ranks 52nd and South Africa ranks 49th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Niger vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/niger/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/niger/south-africa/">Niger vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
254 places, 11,371 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.