Micronesia (country) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)

Micronesia (country)
121.25 million current US$
in 2025
Sao Tome and Principe
119.62 million current US$
in 2025
Micronesia (country) rank
177th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
179th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) over time

  • Micronesia (country)
  • Sao Tome and Principe
25.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M198320042025

How they compare

Micronesia (country) currently reports 121.25 million current US$ against 119.62 million current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1.63 million current US$.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.

Micronesia (country) ranks 177th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 179th of 206 countries.

Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (country) Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 69.50 million current US$ 19.44 million current US$ 50.06 million current US$ Micronesia (country)
2010s 86.28 million current US$ 36.48 million current US$ 49.80 million current US$ Micronesia (country)
2020s 99.62 million current US$ 89.55 million current US$ 10.08 million current US$ Micronesia (country)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Micronesia (country) or Sao Tome and Principe?
Micronesia (country), at 121.25 million current US$ against 119.62 million current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Micronesia (country) and Sao Tome and Principe?
1.63 million current US$, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Sao Tome and Principe?
18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
How do Micronesia (country) and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Micronesia (country) ranks 177th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 179th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia (country) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/micronesia-fed-sts/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/micronesia-fed-sts/sao-tome-and-principe/">Micronesia (country) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
254 places, 11,371 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.