Malaysia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)

Malaysia
38.79 billion current US$
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa
395.96 billion current US$
in 2025
Malaysia rank
26th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
23rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) over time

  • Malaysia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0100.0B200.0B300.0B400.0B500.0B196019922025

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 395.96 billion current US$ against 38.79 billion current US$ in Malaysia, a difference of 357.17 billion current US$.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 10.2 times Malaysia's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Malaysia ranks 26th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd of 206 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1980s 6.30 billion current US$ 56.16 billion current US$ 49.86 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 9.43 billion current US$ 82.51 billion current US$ 73.07 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 13.32 billion current US$ 131.50 billion current US$ 118.17 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 28.14 billion current US$ 276.26 billion current US$ 248.12 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 34.01 billion current US$ 403.66 billion current US$ 369.65 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Malaysia or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 395.96 billion current US$ against 38.79 billion current US$ in Malaysia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Malaysia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
357.17 billion current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
45 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2025.
How do Malaysia and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Malaysia ranks 26th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/malaysia/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/malaysia/sub-saharan-africa/">Malaysia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
254 places, 11,371 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.