Malaysia vs Saudi Arabia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Malaysia
38.79 billion current US$
in 2025
Saudi Arabia
33.07 billion current US$
in 2025
Malaysia rank
26th
Saudi Arabia rank
29th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Malaysia
  • Saudi Arabia
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B196019922025

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 38.79 billion current US$ against 33.07 billion current US$ in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 5.72 billion current US$.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 26th and Saudi Arabia ranks 29th of 206 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.13 billion current US$ 213.67 million current US$ 915.34 million current US$ Malaysia
1970s 2.86 billion current US$ 574.35 million current US$ 2.29 billion current US$ Malaysia
1980s 6.24 billion current US$ 3.59 billion current US$ 2.64 billion current US$ Malaysia
1990s 9.43 billion current US$ 8.15 billion current US$ 1.29 billion current US$ Malaysia
2000s 13.32 billion current US$ 10.49 billion current US$ 2.83 billion current US$ Malaysia
2010s 28.14 billion current US$ 18.19 billion current US$ 9.95 billion current US$ Malaysia
2020s 34.01 billion current US$ 28.11 billion current US$ 5.90 billion current US$ Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Malaysia or Saudi Arabia?
Malaysia, at 38.79 billion current US$ against 33.07 billion current US$ in Saudi Arabia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Malaysia and Saudi Arabia?
5.72 billion current US$, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Saudi Arabia?
58 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2025.
How do Malaysia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Malaysia ranks 26th and Saudi Arabia ranks 29th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Saudi Arabia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/malaysia/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/malaysia/saudi-arabia/">Malaysia vs Saudi Arabia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
254 places, 11,371 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.