Iceland vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Iceland
1.41 billion current US$
in 2025
South Sudan
1.24 billion current US$
in 2015
Iceland rank
129th
South Sudan rank
131st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Iceland
  • South Sudan
500.0M750.0M1.0B1.2B1.5B1.8B199520102025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 1.41 billion current US$ against 1.24 billion current US$ in South Sudan, a difference of 167.48 million current US$.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 129th and South Sudan ranks 131st of 206 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland South Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 811.99 million current US$ 625.22 million current US$ 186.77 million current US$ Iceland
2010s 970.38 million current US$ 1.05 billion current US$ 77.23 million current US$ South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Iceland or South Sudan?
Iceland, at 1.41 billion current US$ against 1.24 billion current US$ in South Sudan as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Iceland and South Sudan?
167.48 million current US$, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and South Sudan?
8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
How do Iceland and South Sudan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Iceland ranks 129th and South Sudan ranks 131st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/iceland/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/iceland/south-sudan/">Iceland vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
254 places, 11,371 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.