Denmark vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added

Denmark
5.41 billion current US$
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
5.24 billion current US$
in 2024
Denmark rank
87th
Papua New Guinea rank
90th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added over time

  • Denmark
  • Papua New Guinea
02.0B4.0B6.0B196119932025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 5.41 billion current US$ against 5.24 billion current US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 165.30 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 87th and Papua New Guinea ranks 90th of 206 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 6 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 786.53 million current US$ 196.39 million current US$ 590.14 million current US$ Denmark
1970s 1.78 billion current US$ 444.47 million current US$ 1.34 billion current US$ Denmark
1980s 3.10 billion current US$ 890.89 million current US$ 2.21 billion current US$ Denmark
1990s 4.29 billion current US$ 1.35 billion current US$ 2.94 billion current US$ Denmark
2000s 3.39 billion current US$ 1.62 billion current US$ 1.77 billion current US$ Denmark
2010s 4.02 billion current US$ 3.84 billion current US$ 187.56 million current US$ Denmark
2020s 4.26 billion current US$ 5.05 billion current US$ 791.66 million current US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Denmark or Papua New Guinea?
Denmark, at 5.41 billion current US$ against 5.24 billion current US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Denmark and Papua New Guinea?
165.30 million current US$, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Papua New Guinea?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2024.
How do Denmark and Papua New Guinea rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Denmark ranks 87th and Papua New Guinea ranks 90th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/denmark/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/denmark/papua-new-guinea/">Denmark vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
254 places, 11,371 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.