Cape Verde vs Hong Kong: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)

Cape Verde
153.97 million current US$
in 2025
Hong Kong
152.36 million current US$
in 2024
Cape Verde rank
172nd
Hong Kong rank
173rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Hong Kong
0100.0M200.0M300.0M198020022025

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 153.97 million current US$ against 152.36 million current US$ in Hong Kong, a difference of 1.61 million current US$.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 172nd and Hong Kong ranks 173rd of 206 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Hong Kong Difference Ahead
2000s 86.76 million current US$ 132.70 million current US$ 45.94 million current US$ Hong Kong
2010s 109.88 million current US$ 190.26 million current US$ 80.38 million current US$ Hong Kong
2020s 120.49 million current US$ 221.37 million current US$ 100.88 million current US$ Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Cape Verde or Hong Kong?
Cape Verde, at 153.97 million current US$ against 152.36 million current US$ in Hong Kong as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Cape Verde and Hong Kong?
1.61 million current US$, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Hong Kong?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Cape Verde and Hong Kong rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Cape Verde ranks 172nd and Hong Kong ranks 173rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Hong Kong: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/cabo-verde/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/cabo-verde/hong-kong-sar-china/">Cape Verde vs Hong Kong: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
254 places, 11,371 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.