Bolivia vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)

Bolivia
4.84 billion current US$
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
5.24 billion current US$
in 2024
Bolivia rank
93rd
Papua New Guinea rank
90th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) over time

  • Bolivia
  • Papua New Guinea
02.0B4.0B6.0B196119922024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 5.24 billion current US$ against 4.84 billion current US$ in Bolivia, a difference of 399.42 million current US$.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Bolivia ranks 93rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 90th of 206 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 456.71 million current US$ 444.47 million current US$ 12.24 million current US$ Bolivia
1980s 891.62 million current US$ 890.89 million current US$ 730,000 current US$ Bolivia
1990s 954.33 million current US$ 1.35 billion current US$ 399.35 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 1.30 billion current US$ 1.62 billion current US$ 324.77 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 3.14 billion current US$ 3.84 billion current US$ 700.42 million current US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 4.44 billion current US$ 5.05 billion current US$ 608.85 million current US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Bolivia or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 5.24 billion current US$ against 4.84 billion current US$ in Bolivia as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Bolivia and Papua New Guinea?
399.42 million current US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Papua New Guinea?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Bolivia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Bolivia ranks 93rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 90th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 15 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/bolivia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/bolivia/papua-new-guinea/">Bolivia vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
254 places, 11,371 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.