Australia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)

Australia
40.76 billion current US$
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa
395.96 billion current US$
in 2025
Australia rank
24th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
23rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) over time

  • Australia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0100.0B200.0B300.0B400.0B500.0B198120032025

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 395.96 billion current US$ against 40.76 billion current US$ in Australia, a difference of 355.20 billion current US$.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 9.7 times Australia's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 24th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd of 206 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 11.67 billion current US$ 82.51 billion current US$ 70.83 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 18.04 billion current US$ 131.50 billion current US$ 113.46 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 32.51 billion current US$ 276.26 billion current US$ 243.75 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 38.22 billion current US$ 403.66 billion current US$ 365.44 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added, Australia or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 395.96 billion current US$ against 40.76 billion current US$ in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added between Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
355.20 billion current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added?
Australia ranks 24th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 23rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/australia/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us/australia/sub-saharan-africa/">Australia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
254 places, 11,371 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing corresponds to ISIC (Rev. 4) divisions 01-03 and includes the exploitation of vegetal and animal natural resources, comprising the activities of growing of crops, raising and breeding of animals, harvesting of timber and other plants, animals or animal products from a farm or their natural habitats.Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.