Europe & Central Asia vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … US unit GDP current

Europe & Central Asia
0.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
0.1702 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Europe & Central Asia rank
41st
Papua New Guinea rank
44th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … US unit GDP current over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Papua New Guinea
00.10.20.30.40.5196119932025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.1702 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 0.1502 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 8.5 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 41st and Papua New Guinea ranks 44th of 45 groups.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0319 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3078 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2759 current US$ per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2000s 0.0213 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2917 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2704 current US$ per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2010s 0.0206 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.182 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1614 current US$ per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea
2020s 0.0202 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1773 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1571 current US$ per US$ of GDP Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per, Europe & Central Asia or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.1702 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per between Europe & Central Asia and Papua New Guinea?
0.1502 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Papua New Guinea?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 41st and Papua New Guinea ranks 44th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia/papua-new-guinea/">Europe & Central Asia vs Papua New Guinea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 11,345 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.