East Asia & Pacific vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … US unit GDP current

East Asia & Pacific
0.0553 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Rwanda
0.203 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific rank
34th
Rwanda rank
37th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … US unit GDP current over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Rwanda
00.20.40.60.8196019922025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.203 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0553 current US$ per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 0.1477 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 3.7 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 37th of 45 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2468 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6932 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4463 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1970s 0.1431 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5389 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3958 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1980s 0.0842 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.402 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3178 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1990s 0.0479 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3956 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3477 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2000s 0.0479 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2964 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2485 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2010s 0.0567 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2355 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1788 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 0.0564 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2196 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1632 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.203 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0553 current US$ per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific and Rwanda?
0.1477 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Rwanda?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Rwanda rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 37th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific/rwanda/">East Asia & Pacific vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 11,345 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.