How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Oman?

51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2020.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cuba vs Oman: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … US unit GDP current

Cuba

0.0276 current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2020

Oman

0.0281 current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Cuba rank

137th

Oman rank

136th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … US unit GDP current over time

Cuba
Oman

How they compare

Oman currently reports 0.0281 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0276 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Cuba, a difference of 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Oman ahead.

Cuba ranks 137th and Oman ranks 136th of 204 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cuba	Oman	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.1213 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0679 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0534 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Cuba
1980s	0.1227 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0302 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0924 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Cuba
1990s	0.0892 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0233 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0659 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Cuba
2000s	0.0496 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0158 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0338 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Cuba
2010s	0.0379 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0152 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0227 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Cuba
2020s	0.0276 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0247 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0029 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per, Cuba or Oman?: Oman, at 0.0281 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0276 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Cuba as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per between Cuba and Oman?: 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Oman?: 51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2020.
How do Cuba and Oman rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per?: Cuba ranks 137th and Oman ranks 136th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Oman: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cuba/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cuba/oman/">Cuba vs Oman: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 252 places, 11,345 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.