Cayman Islands vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … US unit GDP current

Cayman Islands
0.0045 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0035 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Cayman Islands rank
191st
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
193rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … US unit GDP current over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0030.0050.0070.010.013200120122024

How they compare

Cayman Islands currently reports 0.0045 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0035 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.001 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Cayman Islands's figure about 1.3 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Cayman Islands ranks 191st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 193rd of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cayman Islands averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0027 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0079 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0052 current US$ per US$ of GDP Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0037 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0045 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.0044 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0039 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP Cayman Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per, Cayman Islands or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Cayman Islands, at 0.0045 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0035 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per between Cayman Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.001 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Cayman Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Cayman Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per?
Cayman Islands ranks 191st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 193rd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cayman-islands/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cayman-islands/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Cayman Islands vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 11,345 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.