Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US

Lithuania
748.66 current US$ per person
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
299.6 current US$ per person
in 2025
Lithuania rank
40th
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
37th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US over time

  • Lithuania
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
02004006008001.0k198120032025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 748.66 current US$ per person against 299.6 current US$ per person in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 449.06 current US$ per person.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 2.5 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 40th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 37th of 204 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1990s 235.37 current US$ per person 153.6 current US$ per person 81.77 current US$ per person Lithuania
2000s 299.07 current US$ per person 166.16 current US$ per person 132.9 current US$ per person Lithuania
2010s 527.58 current US$ per person 272.36 current US$ per person 255.22 current US$ per person Lithuania
2020s 780.03 current US$ per person 325.3 current US$ per person 454.73 current US$ per person Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per, Lithuania or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Lithuania, at 748.66 current US$ per person against 299.6 current US$ per person in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per between Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
449.06 current US$ per person, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per?
Lithuania ranks 40th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 37th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-capita/lithuania/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-capita/lithuania/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 11,345 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.