Late-demographic dividend vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US

Late-demographic dividend
804.95 current US$ per person
in 2025
New Zealand
1,976 current US$ per person
in 2023
Late-demographic dividend rank
3rd
New Zealand rank
5th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • New Zealand
01.0k2.0k3.0k196019922025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1,976 current US$ per person against 804.95 current US$ per person in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 1,171 current US$ per person.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 2.5 times Late-demographic dividend's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 3rd and New Zealand ranks 5th of 45 groups.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 104.37 current US$ per person 476.79 current US$ per person 372.42 current US$ per person New Zealand
1980s 142.79 current US$ per person 674.66 current US$ per person 531.88 current US$ per person New Zealand
1990s 149.24 current US$ per person 963.88 current US$ per person 814.64 current US$ per person New Zealand
2000s 231.81 current US$ per person 1,351 current US$ per person 1,120 current US$ per person New Zealand
2010s 552.07 current US$ per person 2,337 current US$ per person 1,785 current US$ per person New Zealand
2020s 735.51 current US$ per person 2,376 current US$ per person 1,640 current US$ per person New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per, Late-demographic dividend or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 1,976 current US$ per person against 804.95 current US$ per person in Late-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per between Late-demographic dividend and New Zealand?
1,171 current US$ per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and New Zealand?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Late-demographic dividend and New Zealand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 3rd and New Zealand ranks 5th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-capita/late-demographic-dividend/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-capita/late-demographic-dividend/new-zealand/">Late-demographic dividend vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 11,345 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.