Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
282.66 current US$ per person
in 2025
Lithuania
748.66 current US$ per person
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
42nd
Lithuania rank
40th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Lithuania
02004006008001.0k198120032025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 748.66 current US$ per person against 282.66 current US$ per person in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 466 current US$ per person.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 2.6 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 42nd and Lithuania ranks 40th of 45 groups.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 100.69 current US$ per person 235.37 current US$ per person 134.68 current US$ per person Lithuania
2000s 129.65 current US$ per person 299.07 current US$ per person 169.42 current US$ per person Lithuania
2010s 203.24 current US$ per person 527.58 current US$ per person 324.34 current US$ per person Lithuania
2020s 248.63 current US$ per person 780.03 current US$ per person 531.4 current US$ per person Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 748.66 current US$ per person against 282.66 current US$ per person in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
466 current US$ per person, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Lithuania rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 42nd and Lithuania ranks 40th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-capita/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-capita/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/lithuania/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Lithuania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 11,345 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.