East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Iceland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
805.09 current US$ per person
in 2025
Iceland
3,593 current US$ per person
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
2nd
Iceland rank
3rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Iceland
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196019922025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 3,593 current US$ per person against 805.09 current US$ per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 2,788 current US$ per person.

That makes Iceland's figure about 4.5 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 2nd and Iceland ranks 3rd of 45 groups.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 144.23 current US$ per person 2,459 current US$ per person 2,315 current US$ per person Iceland
2000s 215.09 current US$ per person 2,532 current US$ per person 2,317 current US$ per person Iceland
2010s 560.57 current US$ per person 2,978 current US$ per person 2,417 current US$ per person Iceland
2020s 767.78 current US$ per person 3,228 current US$ per person 2,460 current US$ per person Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Iceland?
Iceland, at 3,593 current US$ per person against 805.09 current US$ per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Iceland?
2,788 current US$ per person, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Iceland?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Iceland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 2nd and Iceland ranks 3rd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Iceland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/iceland/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Iceland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 11,345 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.