East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Greenland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
805.09 current US$ per person
in 2025
Greenland
9,686 current US$ per person
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
2nd
Greenland rank
2nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Greenland
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k196019922025

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 9,686 current US$ per person against 805.09 current US$ per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 8,881 current US$ per person.

That makes Greenland's figure about 12.0 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 2nd and Greenland ranks 2nd of 45 groups.

Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Greenland Difference Ahead
2000s 246.19 current US$ per person 5,555 current US$ per person 5,309 current US$ per person Greenland
2010s 560.57 current US$ per person 8,218 current US$ per person 7,658 current US$ per person Greenland
2020s 755.01 current US$ per person 9,021 current US$ per person 8,266 current US$ per person Greenland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Greenland?
Greenland, at 9,686 current US$ per person against 805.09 current US$ per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Greenland?
8,881 current US$ per person, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Greenland?
21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Greenland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 2nd and Greenland ranks 2nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Greenland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/greenland/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Greenland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 11,345 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.