China vs Low & middle income: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US

China
923.03 current US$ per person
in 2025
Low & middle income
555.24 current US$ per person
in 2025
China rank
26th
Low & middle income rank
24th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US over time

  • China
  • Low & middle income
02004006008001.0k196019922025

How they compare

China currently reports 923.03 current US$ per person against 555.24 current US$ per person in Low & middle income, a difference of 367.79 current US$ per person.

That makes China's figure about 1.7 times Low & middle income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Low & middle income ahead.

China ranks 26th and Low & middle income ranks 24th of 204 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Low & middle income in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Low & middle income Difference Ahead
1960s 32.75 current US$ per person 52.17 current US$ per person 19.41 current US$ per person Low & middle income
1970s 49.13 current US$ per person 85.9 current US$ per person 36.77 current US$ per person Low & middle income
1980s 71.03 current US$ per person 123.77 current US$ per person 52.74 current US$ per person Low & middle income
1990s 108.67 current US$ per person 140.23 current US$ per person 31.55 current US$ per person Low & middle income
2000s 222 current US$ per person 193.4 current US$ per person 28.61 current US$ per person China
2010s 620.66 current US$ per person 405.97 current US$ per person 214.69 current US$ per person China
2020s 893.5 current US$ per person 527.84 current US$ per person 365.66 current US$ per person China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per, China or Low & middle income?
China, at 923.03 current US$ per person against 555.24 current US$ per person in Low & middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per between China and Low & middle income?
367.79 current US$ per person, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Low & middle income?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do China and Low & middle income rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per?
China ranks 26th and Low & middle income ranks 24th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Low & middle income: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-capita/china/low-and-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-capita/china/low-and-middle-income/">China vs Low & middle income: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 11,345 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.