China vs Early-demographic dividend: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US

China
923.03 current US$ per person
in 2025
Early-demographic dividend
490.1 current US$ per person
in 2025
China rank
26th
Early-demographic dividend rank
26th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US over time

  • China
  • Early-demographic dividend
02004006008001.0k196019922025

How they compare

China currently reports 923.03 current US$ per person against 490.1 current US$ per person in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 432.93 current US$ per person.

That makes China's figure about 1.9 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Early-demographic dividend ahead.

China ranks 26th and Early-demographic dividend ranks 26th of 204 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Early-demographic dividend in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Early-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1960s 37.98 current US$ per person 60.16 current US$ per person 22.18 current US$ per person Early-demographic dividend
1970s 49.13 current US$ per person 92.19 current US$ per person 43.06 current US$ per person Early-demographic dividend
1980s 71.03 current US$ per person 136.27 current US$ per person 65.24 current US$ per person Early-demographic dividend
1990s 108.67 current US$ per person 145.97 current US$ per person 37.3 current US$ per person Early-demographic dividend
2000s 222 current US$ per person 179.32 current US$ per person 42.69 current US$ per person China
2010s 620.66 current US$ per person 343.92 current US$ per person 276.74 current US$ per person China
2020s 893.5 current US$ per person 449.55 current US$ per person 443.95 current US$ per person China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per, China or Early-demographic dividend?
China, at 923.03 current US$ per person against 490.1 current US$ per person in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per between China and Early-demographic dividend?
432.93 current US$ per person, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Early-demographic dividend?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do China and Early-demographic dividend rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per?
China ranks 26th and Early-demographic dividend ranks 26th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Early-demographic dividend: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-capita/china/early-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-current-us-per-capita/china/early-demographic-dividend/">China vs Early-demographic dividend: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
252 places, 11,345 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.