Belarus vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added … capita current US over time
- Belarus
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 709.2 current US$ per person against 299.58 current US$ per person in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 409.62 current US$ per person.
That makes Belarus's figure about 2.4 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 42nd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 39th of 204 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 259.6 current US$ per person | 139.44 current US$ per person | 120.17 current US$ per person | Belarus |
| 2000s | 277.8 current US$ per person | 166.15 current US$ per person | 111.65 current US$ per person | Belarus |
| 2010s | 482.2 current US$ per person | 272.36 current US$ per person | 209.84 current US$ per person | Belarus |
| 2020s | 582.63 current US$ per person | 325.29 current US$ per person | 257.34 current US$ per person | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per, Belarus or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Belarus, at 709.2 current US$ per person against 299.58 current US$ per person in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per between Belarus and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 409.62 current US$ per person, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current us$), per?
- Belarus ranks 42nd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 39th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.